What should be Incentive Structure : Comparision between conventional models and making best combination
BASED ON CHAPTER “LONE WOLVES STARVING” FROM CLAUDIO FERNANDEZ' BOOK - "It's not how or what but the WHO"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kinds of pay structures.
- EAT WHAT YOU KILL – “PAY AS YOU
PERFORM"
- LOCKSTEPS – “People pay is
unrelated to their personal contribution and instead varies
according to some pre-established formula related to years of service,
years as a partner or participation in local or global profits.
“Eat What You Kill” Vs “Locksteps”
“LOCKSTEP EFFECT” – Star A would rail against being paid as lazy C
and leave to make twice as much money at an eat-what-you-kill firm. C
would never leave, since he gets a free ride, compared with noting an eat-what-you-kill
firm. B would be constantly weighing her options: work more and switch teams;
work less and stay. With this formula, lock step firm will lose all its stars
and get stuck with losers
Great hiring in Locksteps to
overcome ill effect
“WEED OUT Cs” – mainly through great hiring but also by periodically reviewing existing employees and if necessary, getting rid of the weakest – we are left with all A’s and B’s, our average performance increases and we would be able to pay everyone more
Though risk will be there
There is still a threat of
stars leaving, since the top eat-what-you-kill pay remains higher. That’s where a culture kicks
in; we have to hire people with penchant (a strong liking)
for collaboration and then constantly reinforce those values. When we do it, performance
increases again. Than need to share overall
firm’s profit. People will be happy to get
best-qualified colleague. Rather than hoarding, they
will freely share cases, knowledge, sources, references. Hence productivity will
increase and value to the customers. Performance range is no longer
from B to A, but from B+ to A+, with average pay coming in at an even higher
level
Best practice locksteps effect
Mixing strong culture in locksteps to overcome Risk
Yes, our superstar A could perhaps still make a bit more
money in eat-what-you-kill. But she will realize that her performance might
suffer when her collaborative colleagues are replaced by more competitive, self-interested
ones.
If she instinctively values teamwork, or has learned to
do so, she’d also feel out of place and desperately miss the camaraderie (Good
Fellowship) comes with a professional family.
WHY BE A LONE WOLF STARVING WHEN WE CAN HUNT WITH OTHERS
AND FEAST TOGETHER?
CONCLUSION
In today’s knowledge economy, value comes from
collectively creating and seamlessly sharing information
When leading a team of any size, do whatever is in our
power to make sure the incentive for meeting collective goals outweigh those
for individual performance.
Then adopt the kind of people practices and culture that
will keep the strongest wolves in our “pack”.



Comments
Post a Comment