How to Select , Retain and Grow talent in our company (Based on Articles and Books published by "Claudio Fernandez"
"Who Principal" - The outstanding leadership and the ability to build superior executive teams are the two essential and foundational prerequisites for remarkable corporate performance.
"First get the right people on the buss, wrong people off the bus, and the right people into the right seats and then figure out where to drive the bus. " Quote from the Book "Good to Great"
NEED AND CHALLENGES OF
FILLING ORGANIZATION WITH BEST PEOPLE
Hiring
Great People Is Good for one’s Career
“Making
great people decisions is an essential life skill….the most decisive skill in
determining our career success, and also our personal happiness.”
Unless
our business is very small, no matter how talented we are, how great we are at
management or how hard we are willing to work, eventually we will have to
delegate to other people. To succeed, we must run our business with talent and
energy while attracting and serving customers. Our genetics, personal and
professional development, and prior hiring decisions join together to determine
if we will be an excellent employer or not.
Many
of the important decisions we will make as a manager will be about the people on
our team and how we accomplish our work through them. Making great people decisions
is a factor in our success that we can actually do something about, unlike our
genetic makeup. We can develop and improve our skills in hiring and managing
talented people. Becoming an expert about people doesn’t come simply or
quickly, but nothing we do will provide us with higher returns in terms of
success and career satisfaction. Strangely, most managers believe they are better
at people decisions than they are. However, improvement in this area will
reward us with greater satisfaction in our work and personal life.
Hiring
Great People Is Good for our Company
”Despite the urgent
need to improve our performance in making people decisions, many organizations
still lack effective succession programs, or indeed, any succession program at
all.”
Making
great decisions about people isn’t just great for our career; it is also great
for our company. In his bestsellers Built to Last and Good to Great, Jim
Collins looked at the factors that distinguish leading companies and found that
successful companies have outstanding leadership. Further, those leaders build
superb executive teams to execute their companies’ strategies. Conversely, CEOs
who don’t fix their people problems, or who make poor choices about people,
often lead their companies into trouble. These executives damage both their
companies and their careers. In 1985, Peter Drucker said that executives get
about one-third of their people decisions right, one-third are minimally
effective, and the other one-third are simply failures. The good news is that
we can improve our ability to make great people decisions.
Why
hiring great people is difficult?
“Inept
managers not only do their own jobs badly; they also destroy the performance
(and potential) of the people around them.”
We
probably can tell rather sensational stories about hires that looked perfect.
The candidates had the perfect educational backgrounds, professional experiences
and strong market connections; they interviewed perfectly. Yet, their job
performance turned into horror shows. What went wrong? You may think you know
how to hire better than actually you do. Hiring decisions are hard for four
reasons;
1.
The odds are against us (Statistical Odds)
a.
Distribution of talent has a very large
spread. In many cases, there are only a small number of exceptional performers.
2.
Difficult Assessments – “Assessing people
for complex positions is inherently difficult”
a.
Impact of Assessment Errors
· Even
if having 90% accuracy in assessment we have 50-50 chance of selecting right
individual. (solution increase more number of assessors having 90% accuracy)
b.
Unique Jobs
· The
higher we move up the organizational pyramid, moreover, the more unique these
position become.
c.
Changing Jobs
· What
is needed today can be quite different from what’s needed tomorrow in VUCA
situation of Market. (Versatile, Unpredictable, Complex and Ambiguous)
d.
Intangible Traits
· Soft
skills area – Result Orientation, Ability to collaborate, develop people, lead
teams and manage change. Not accurate for self, how for others?
e.
Inaccessible Candidates
· Higher
the rank, lower the tolerance of thorough evaluation. Also some talented
candidates not looking for the job.
3.
Psychological Biases – “Powerful
psychological biases impair the quality of the decision making process”. To
overcome below biases (1) Build Awareness (2)
have right advisors, both inside and outside organization
a.
Procrastination
· Delaying
the decisions when things seem to be going reasonable well, the tendency is to
exaggerate the risks of change and to
disregard the opportunity costs of the status quo.
b.
Overrating Capability
· Understanding
whom we hire or promote to top positions are more capable than they actually
are in case of individual self-assessment is usually inaccurate. They are
highly optimistic. There is difference between motivation to perform and actual
capacity to do so.
c.
Snap Judgements
· When
assessing a candidate, first impression play a major role, as do gossip and
other second-hand informational about the candidate. Sometimes, one piece of
bad information eliminates an individual who, on balance, may be the best
candidate. We rely heavily on unreliable indicators such as a candidate’s
charisma, to predict future performance.
d.
Branding
· Over
emphasis on Company where candidate is coming from
e.
Evaluating people in absolute terms
· Attaching
stigma – “Outstanding Manager” , “Loser”
· Asking
for Strengths and Weaknesses. How do candidate see him or herself from five
years now. (To improve on this (Ask
questions in particular context))
f.
Seeking confirmatory information
· Stick
to hypothesis made in beginning , not being ready to reframe or change it
instead, anyhow seeking confirmatory information
g.
Saving face
· Try
to justify wrong people decisions to save face
h.
Sticking with familiar
· Hiring
from same company or known individuals
i.
Emotional anchoring
· Judging
candidate relative to someone familiar (or to each other) rather than on their
own merits.
j.
Herding
· Not
speaking up own doubts or queries due to fear of looking odd to what others are
saying or look offensive to their opinions
4.
Wrong Incentives – “Misplaced incentives
and conflicts of interest can easily sabotage these decisions”
a.
Candidate circumstances
· Not
checking whether candidate’s circumstances can push them toward either
self-serving dishonesty or unfairly self-critical honesty.
b.
Political pressures
· Pushing
known candidate and compromising merits due to pressure of some influential or
important person in fear of not offending him/her or his/her opinion.
How
to Know When we need a Change
Do
we still believe that our organization is great at people decisions? Consider
what 75% of the executives surveyed said about their firms in a study by
McKinsey & Company:
·
They did not “recruit highly talented
people.”
·
They did not “identify high and low
performers.”
·
They did not “retain top talent and assign
the best to fast-track jobs.”
·
They did not “hold line managers
accountable for people quality.”
·
They did not “develop talent effectively.”
Sometimes
the need for change is obvious. When your CEO retires or dies, or the owners decide
to sell the company, we know there will be a change at the top. When our company
decides to expand through a major investment in a new business, we know staffing
changes are the inevitable result. When public firms engage in mergers and acquisitions,
their CEOs always claim that nothing will change, but we know better. Firms
that adopt a radically new marketing strategy will require leadership changes.
Some
changes are less obvious. Successful companies grow and try to keep their
formulas in place as long as possible, often for far too long. Management has
to make changes to keep the engine of success pulling the expanding load.
Talented leaders will be looking to the future and planning ahead for changes.
Since we may get resistance in the midst of change, we must plan in advance to avoid
failing. Stay honest and deal with every issue in the present while keeping a
clear view of the future. Root out every tendency to stay in a past that is
dead and gone.
|
Following
Criteria are evaluated for selecting a candidate at organization. The criteria
and its weightage shall be different for different position while evaluating
the same. This document provides a base or pool of criteria from where we can
pick and choose few or several among depending on need. However tools for
evaluating these criteria are not part of these document.
1)
Job Knowledge
i.
Professional Degree
ii.
Industry Experience (Years)
iii.
Function Exposure (Years)
iv.
Technical Knowhow of the position
v.
Language Verbal and Written Skills required
for the position
vi.
Organization Hierarchy match between
previous and position applied for
vii.
Having Conventional or unconventional
career (to check portability of working with different people and different
scenarios in different Organization context, Major jobs shifts
suggest that a person is seeking learning, challenge and growth and has
wherewithal (infinitive) to master new companies, sectors, cultures and
strategies)
viii.
In case of rehiring (Check)
i.
Benchmark against the field of candidates (comparison
with available talent in market)
ii.
Accepting Trade off - What expect can be compromised, now
realized that it can be ignored. Can’t have it all. If you realize that no one person
can do the essential of the job, you might consider hiring multiple people with
complementary skills or developing the candidate who comes to the closest.
iii.
Timing and Circumstances - Depends on how the
x skills are now more useful to the organization
iv.
Be Aware - Be aware of
changing circumstances. Never assume that people who were great at yesterday's
job will be good at todays. And never assume that people who aren't stars today
couldn't be tomorrow.
2)
Intelligence Quotient
i.
Numerical Aptitude
ii.
Logical Reasoning
iii.
Creative Logic
iv.
Lateral Thinking
v.
Problem Solving
vi.
Memory
3)
Emotional Quotient – must for today’s “VUCA
- Volatile Uncertain Complex Ambiguous” business environment
i.
Flexibility and Adaptability (to the
change)
ii.
Resilience
(Rebounding , Springing Back)
iii.
Empathy (Understanding and entering into
another’s feeling)
iv.
Organizational Awareness
v.
Relationship Management
4)
Leadership Potential
i.
Right kind of “Motivation” - Fierce commitment
to excel in the pursuit of unselfish goals. High potential have great ambition
and want to leave their mark, but they also aspire to big, collective goals,
show deep personal humility, and invest in getting better at everything they
do. Wants to have a positive impact on others for the good of larger group or
organization. He gets satisfaction from seeing others succeed and values
mission over personal reward.
ii.
Curiosity - A penchant (strong liking) for
seeking out new experiences, knowledge and candid feedback and an openness to
learning and change.
iii.
Insight - The ability to gather and make sense
of information that suggest new possibilities
iv.
Engagement - a knack for using emotion and
logic to communicate a persuasive vision and connect with people
v.
Determination - The wherewithal to
fight for difficult goals despite challenges and to bounce back from adversity.
5)
Leadership Abilities
i.
Strategic Orientation - An ability to
engage in broad, complex analytical and conceptual thinking
ii.
Market Insight - A strong understanding of the market
and how it affects the business
iii.
Result Orientation - A commitment to demonstrably
improving results (key business metrics )
iv.
Customer Impact - A passion for serving the customer
v.
Collaboration and Influence - An ability to work
effectively with peers or partners including those not in the line of command
vi.
Developing organizational capability - A drive to
improve the company by attracting and developing top talent
vii.
Team Leadership - Success in focusing, aligning and
building effective groups
viii.
Change Leadership - An ability to drive charge through
people, transforming and aligning an organization around a new goal
6)
Values
i.
Respect
i.
Empathetic
listening
ii.
Giving
due importance to other department’s work
iii.
Acknowledgement
of communication
iv.
Language
& Tone of communication
v.
Resolving
conflicts in private and appreciating in public
vi.
Mentoring/coaching
– maintaining self-esteem
ii.
Teamwork
& Collaboration
i.
Transparency
of intentions
ii.
Support
team members’ development
iii.
Provide
help in difficulties
iv.
Recognizing
contribution made by each team member
v.
Involving
team members
vi.
Setting
clear expectations
iii.
Commitment
& Ownership
i.
Giving
priority to organizational goal over personal goal
ii.
Alignment
with organization’s vision
iii.
Achieving
results within given time
iv.
Dealing
with obstacles (Positive attitude)
v.
Taking
responsibility of mistake & rectifying the same
vi.
Provide
an environment of freedom & support
iv.
Trust
i.
Transparency
ii.
Alignment
of actions with words
v.
Relationship
i.
Spending
quality time
ii.
Understanding
each other
iii.
Managing
emotions or developing coping skills in crisis situation
7)
Portability - Able to
effectively transition from one role, company, industry or country to the next,
not only bringing their unique strengths to each but also growing stronger in
the process
i.
Ability to work in various platforms
ii.
Ability to work on various products
iii.
Ability to work with various kind of people
iv.
Ability
to understand politics
8)
Reading people around the world - Global context. Model
developed by Dutch Researcher Geert Hofstede five dimensions. Can be assessed
with same way on Intelligence values, leadership abilities, EI, Portability. To
assess club with the person (on roll or consultant) with the same country
i.
Power Distance - Reflects the willingness of weaker
members of organizations to accept an unequal distribution of power; it is
quite high in Latin America, Africa, Asia and the Arab world, and very low in
Anglo and Germanic countries
ii.
Individualism - Measures the degree to which the
person is distinguished from the group; North America and Europe are highly
individualistic, while Asia, Africa and Latin America have much stronger
collectivistic values
iii.
Uncertainty avoidance - Indicates tolerance for
ambiguity; it is quite high in Latin America, many southern and eastern
European countries, and Japan and lower for Anglo, Nordica and Chinese cultures
iv.
Masculinity - Scores the distribution of roles across
genders; Japan and several European countries rank as highly masculine, while
Nordic countries are much less so
v.
Long-term orientation - Whether people focus on
distant rather than immediate outcomes; it is high in East Asia, moderate in
Europe, and low in Anglo countries, the Muslim world and Latin America
9)
Reference Check – ( Encourage validity
from candidate and cross check)
i.
Self Awareness and Humility - Can speak of strengths
and weaknesses, driven by Personal or social motives
ii.
Reduce Social Pressure - Tell them references will be
checked at right time. Do not discuss compensation, incentives always on fit.
iii.
Realistic Job Previews - Inform what will be the challenges
at job , Positives and Negatives
iv.
Encourage to discuss role with others - Encourage to
candidate to share upcoming role and his or her readiness with close friends,
colleagues or trusted acquaintances
10)
Reference Check – (From outsiders) -
i.
Comprehensive and relevant list of people to call - Former
bosses, peer and subordinates at several previous places of employment. Narrow
list by specific skills we want to measure. Former bosses are great at
assessing strategic orientation and need for achievement. Peers can help to
measure influence. Subordinates are often the best judges of leadership
ii.
Provide the referee with the right incentives - Start
with highlighting how important it is to have a reliable reference, since the
candidate in the end won't benefit from getting a job in which he is likely to
fail. Explain that no candidate is perfect and all have their individual
strengths and weaknesses; plus, it's useful to know as much as possible so if
the person is hired you can provide the right kind of integration and support.
Emphasize that the referee's comments will be kept completely confidential. And
speak in persons or on the phone rather than via e-mail. It's easier to solicit
the whole truth when you can bear hesitations or emotions in a person's voice
or see it on his or her face.
iii.
Help referee to avoid frequent biases - Avoid broad
question. After checking the person's relationship with the candidate, be
specific about the job and its challenges. Ask whether referee has seen the
candidate perform under similar circumstances. And the-only then-ask what the
candidate's exact role was, what he did, how he did it, and what the
consequences were.
Sample
of Interview Evaluation form for “Marketing Manager”
Sr.
|
Context Rank
|
Context
|
Performance
evaluation criteria
|
Weightage
|
Rating
(1 to 5) -
|
Score
|
1
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
MBA in Marketing
|
8
|
||
2
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
Marketing
exposure (Domestic or International both valid)
|
8
|
||
3
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
Chemical
Industry Experience
|
7
|
||
4
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
Knowhow
of New Product Marketing
|
6
|
||
5
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
Knowhow
of New Market Development
|
6
|
||
6
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
English
Communication Verbal
|
5
|
||
7
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
English
Communication Written
|
5
|
||
8
|
1
|
Knowledge
|
Exposure
in handling people under him or her
|
5
|
||
9
|
2
|
Intelligence
|
Analytical
thinking and Decision Making
|
6
|
||
10
|
3
|
Leadership
Competencies
|
Result
orientation
|
5
|
||
11
|
3
|
Leadership
Competencies
|
Market
Insight
|
5
|
||
12
|
3
|
Leadership
Competencies
|
Team
Leadership
|
5
|
||
13
|
4
|
Potential
|
Determination (achieve
goals despite of challenges)
|
8
|
||
14
|
4
|
Potential
|
Engagement
(connect with people)
|
8
|
||
15
|
4
|
Potential
|
Right Kind of
motivation
|
8
|
||
16
|
5
|
Values
|
Zeal
& Enthusiasm (Entrepreneurship spirit)
|
5
|
||
OVERALL SCORE
|
100
|
|||||
|
Integration
Process – After selecting a best fit candidate for above procedure need to
do following for integrating and retaining of employees. It is addressed
through various policies which are not mentioned over here but a broad
conceptual guideline is intended to be shared.
1)
Accelerated Integration - When a new
person joins your team or takes on a new role, there is a threat of rejection
and the strategies for success is help him or her to integrate and learn about
following steps ;
a.
Lear about - Processes, Team,
Organization Goals, Stakeholders, Culture, Organization Structure, Immediate
priorities and long term aspirations
b.
Check he or she is working effectively by
monitoring ongoing health of score card
c.
Encourage them to meet with everyone who
will play a role in their success (or failure) - Out reach should be in
fiver direction - Boss and other bosses, across to peers, down to subordinates,
out to clients and in to personal contacts such as family members and friends
d.
After 30 days evaluate their professional
goals achievement
e.
After 90 days, consider lining up a 360
degree review and from then on for a year check in monthly
f.
Give critical information on governance
(how things operate in organization culture)
2)
Making People count
a.
Bring Diversity in teams
i.
First, fight your biases against diversity
ii.
Encourage to educate and train about self
and others - e.g. knowing Team Member personality type by MBTI and using
this knowledge to solve conflicts
b.
Coaching
i.
Emotional Competencies Training
c.
Building a culture is compassionate
coaching - Great leaders are great listeners who make their employees feel
valued, see the bigger picture and feel a part of something important. Positive
cheerleaders, committed guides, conscious of the state and progress of their
team and the individuals in it. They are also timely provocateurs, offering the
right dose of tough love when necessary
d.
Developing culture of unconditional love
i.
Select members only after very careful
evaluation so they are best
ii.
Than helping people in difficult
circumstances. "Culture eats strategy for Breakfast". Culture cannot
be duplicated by competitor
e.
Train Leaders - Development efforts for
employees, complementing one another skills. It is much more effective to
concentrate on the competencies in which your people stand the best chance of
getting better, and those that offer the greatest benefits to your team,
depending on your business and strategy. Training leaders in competencies that
match their career stage and team, unit or organization's broader goals
f.
Find Alignment in Team by having complementary
skills - Ensuring that team members have skills that complement each other,
making the whole greater than the sum of its parts
g.
Lock Step pay structure - Eat what you
kill compensation replaced by "Best practices Lockstep" structure
with best values and culture practices. So Star - A category employee wont left
to have great team members. "Why be a lone wolf starving when you can hunt
with others and feast together?"
i.
Value comes from collectively creating
and seamlessly sharing information - When leading a team of any size, do
whatever is in your power to make the incentives for meeting collective goals
outweigh those for individual performance. Then adopt the kind of people practices
and culture that will keep the strongest wolves in your pack.
h.
Promotion - The fact is that giving
people bigger jobs with fancier titles and larger salaries won't make them
better. More complex assignments will. Potential should trump seniority and
that-when it comes to the jobs that help leaders grow most complexity always beats
size
i.
Interesting and challenging work, short term
project based assignments. Allow them to stretch and find new muscles
ii.
Leadership Pipeline – Managing self to
Managing Mangers
i.
Improve Team Performance - Above average
pay but essentially with… Autonomy (the freedom to direct our lives), Mastery
(the desire to achieve excellence in what we do), Purpose (the knowledge that
what we do is in service of something bigger than ourselves)
i.
Setting difficult but attainable
challenges.
ii.
Eliminate distractions so they can become
immersed and work at maximum efficiency.
iii.
Point them to a greater cause - what
good will come from their work, whether it's "everyday low prices" at
Walmart, or to be "the fabric of real time communication for the web"
at Skype
iv.
Do pay well to - Ideally above
average. But realize that money will never motivate the wrong people to do the
right thing. Instead incentivize all the right people you have picked with the
opportunity to play independent roles on your team, to master their skills, and
to pursue broader team, organizational or societal goals.
3)
Manpower Planning
a.
Look externally for more candidates,
ideally periodically but certainly a planned succession approaches or following
an unexpected departure - it is critically important to consider both
insiders and outsiders, particularly for this role. Executive search firms can
add great value here, but make sure to avoid or at least be aware of
contingency arrangements or percentage fees that often cause them to favour
external appointments over internal ones
b.
Robust transition - Outsiders who join
the company three to four years before they become CEOs do just as well as
insiders with much longer tenures
c.
Start planning very early - Ideally when
the new CEO takes charge, but never later than three to four years before be or
she expects to leave
d.
Require the borad to conduct periodic
emergency succession drills – Since about 50 percent of CEO successions are
unplanned.
e.
Create and maintain a clear outline - Of
what you need from the CEO role, informed by the board and detailing all the
required competencies, then regularly assess your leader against it. This might
seem hard to do, but if you do it at lower levels, shouldn't you also do it at
then to where it matters the most?
f.
Build internal bench identifying assessing
and developing potential CEO candidates. And do benchmarking them against the
best external talent
4)
Teams that thrive - Bringing Stars Together
- Team effectiveness review to be measured on following 6 criteria –
a.
The best get even better when they work
together. As a leader, it's your job to build a diverse, effective, committed
group capable of achieving collective greatness;
i.
Openness - How much a team values
engaging with the broader organization and the outside world and builds the
connections to do so
ii.
Energy - How ambitious the team is, and
how much it takes the initiative and maintains long-term momentum at a high
level
iii.
Resilience - How well a team can
hold itself together, even under severe internal or external stress, and remain
effective
iv.
Alignment - How well team members
understand the larger collective purpose, and focus their actions and those of
the team on that objective
v.
Balance - How well a team
understands the importance of diversity of skills and strengths and is willing
to incorporate them
vi.
Efficiency - How well a team
understands the need to optimize resources and theme and drives efficiently for
results
5)
Thriving on Crisis- Hire the best in crisis
to later build the strong team
a.
Keep long-term perspective - don’t become
short-sighted and irrational during difficult times, visionary leaders and
organizations stay calm and use them to their advantage, sprinting away from
their competitors and never looking back
b.
Don’t freeze hiring - selective hiring
of high performing employees from competitors
c.
Think twice before firing anyone
d.
Selectively invest in talent - even if
you have to downsize elsewhere at the same time. Sooner than you expect, the
crisis will end and you will be thriving.
6)
True Leading Boards
a.
Board member assessment –
i.
Values and behaviour : Collaboration
(an openness to teamwork and robust, rigorous debate) and influencing And
integrity and independence (a desire to take principled action, even at
personal risk, for the good of the company)
ii.
Judgement related competencies; Result
orientation (a strong focus on long-term value and a willingness to challenge
the status quo) , strategic orientation (an ability to help shape and implement
corporate strategy by raising key issues and providing relevant advice and counsel)
b.
Promote
someone for board member- by encouraging deserving employee to participate in
services

Comments
Post a Comment